Coverage of Pandemic by Indian National Media: With the focus on Electronic Media
by Zenith Khan
M.A Defense and
Strategic Studies
INTRODUCTION
Highly connected world comes with its
own challenges which are sometimes in the form of large-scale causalities which
are unavoidable. Security is no longer limited to armed forces but covers a
large scale of issues, Health Security being one the many. Covid-19 pandemic
that has gripped the world since the beginning of 2020 remains the biggest
threat to International Security even after a year of fight against this
invisible enemy. Vaccine has been the most important weapon against any
diseases followed by communication. Unlike other outbreaks seen in the past
Spanish flu the new pandemics like Ebola or the recent Coronavirus were
accompanied by a supplementary challenge of Infodemic (An epidemic of
Information). Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Director General of World Health
Organisation gave a statement saying, “We’re not just fighting an epidemic;
we’re fighting an Infodemic which spreads faster and more easily than this
virus”. The dissemination of this is in the hands of Media Houses,
both electronic and print accompanied by social media which is the largest
source of information and disinformation. A study by Reddit and Wikipedia on
the Covid-19 pandemic showed that people are highly reactive to the news they
are exposed to, in the beginning of an outbreak, the quality and type of
information provided might have critical effects on risk perception,
behaviours, and ultimately on the unfolding of the disease [[1]].
In April 2020, research by Harvard observed that a number of March 2020 polls
showed that Republicans were less worried than were Democrats about exposure to
the virus (Gallup 2020), less likely to consider the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak a
major health threat [[2]].
All the choices and bifurcation were based on their preference of Media
Consumption which in turns was based on their political inclination. This
brings us to another point of media biases, which is selective in the
information they deliver to the audience or twisting the words to make it
appear either pro- government or anti-government. Nevertheless, both the
scenarios are capable of creating inevitable damage to the already existing
Covid Situation.
Covid Coverage by Indian National
Media:
Coverage of two
major religious gathering during Covid
Tablighi Jamaat
The “Markaz
event” was dubbed by Indian media as a coronavirus hotspot by the
right-wing media. It was reported that the information on COVID‐19 were
given a communal color on social media and TV channels, with the “Muslim”
community demonized. The editorial in Hindustan Times argued
that while actions must be taken on the Tablighi Jamaat leadership for
violating social distancing rules, blaming Muslim community for this whole
episode must be resisted (Hindustan Times, 2020). There were fake
videos which were also used as sources by right wing media houses to spread
hatred. The State's handling of the
Markaz issue have been quite apparent but was not covered well in the
mainstream media, especially on the inability of both Delhi and the central
government. [8]
The Kumbh Mela
The government
was widely criticized by left wing for organizing this gathering which also
worked in its favour as it mostly covers news which is anti- establishment.
While the right wing called out opposition for their statements on rituals of
Kumbh rather than questioning the permission given for such a mass
gathering. It is important to note that both the gatherings were wrong.
The first gathering of Tablighi Jamaat could have been used by both the sides
to analyze other major gatherings that may take place in future and how
government can prevent it. The extensive ground reporting before the start
of Kumbh was major source of information for the Hindu pilgrims. Had
the media shown repercussion of such mass gathering during covid crises they
would have also influenced the choice made by pilgrims.
Conclusion
Pandemic was
one point where both left and right could have come together taking a neutral
stand but political biases did not allow it to happen. While
anti-government media houses were able to question the government better during
the pandemic, the pro-government media was able to question other stakeholders
working on the ground level. The communal gap which was created was the major
setback. If there was a violent reaction to the situation by any of the
communities, it would have only made it hard to contain the entire pandemic in
the overly populated country. Indian media needs to learn to represent and use
facts in its reporting rather than promoting the individual opinion of their
respective journalists.
[1] Nicol`o Gozzi,
Michele Tizzani, Michele Starnini, Fabio Ciulla, Daniela Paolotti, Andr´e
Panisson and Nicola Perra,
CollectiveresponsetothemediacoverageofCOVID-19PandemiconRedditandWikipedia,
Networks and Urban Systems Centre, University of Greenwich, London, UK, June
12, 2020.
[2] The Relation
between Media Consumption and Misinformation at the Outset of the SARS-CoV-2
Pandemic in the US, The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1, The
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review1, April 2020, Volume 1,
Issue 2 April 2020, Volume 1, Issue 2
[3]Zee News, important
news on coronavirus , https://youtu.be/CePMNxt_BCw, DNA, 26
April 2021
[4] Times Now,
Frankly speaking with Union Minister, https://youtu.be/kbqRRvq8Z8U, 18
April 2021
Times Now, did Delhi Government create oxygen panic, https://youtu.be/kUYhSVhVHWk, 25
June 2021
Republic tv, Time for India to unite and not settle political
score, https://youtu.be/b4FhTP9KJaU, 24
April,2021
[5] NDTV, Are
Government Covid data accurate, https://youtu.be/Jr14SC3aoHI, Prime
Time, 26 May 2021
NDTV, Centre Trashes New York Times report on Covid, Prime
Time, https://youtu.be/Jr14SC3aoHI, 27
May 2021
[6] India’s Covid Crises
[7] The Wire, Karan
Thapar for Wire, 19- April 2020
[8] Parth Sharma, Abhijit Anand,
Indian media coverage of Nizamuddin Markaz event during COVID-19 pandemic, APP
Wiley, 3 November 2020
Comments
Post a Comment